![]() I’m so angry I want to protest what is happening. Protests are a tough subject. They accomplish many things. They make our reactions to what is happening more visible to the public. They sometimes get helpful publicity for an important issue. They feel wonderful in the moment, to be with people with similar views, to feel the energy of the crowd, to feel that we are taking action. Protests are dangerous. At the women's march in 2017 I lost my mother in the crowd, which was as terrifying as anything I've experienced to date. Sometimes people take advantage of the chaos to engage in violence against buildings and, less often, against people. Sometimes the powers-that-be respond with excessive force, either by accident or as a way to show they can't be moved. But a small number of protests have resulted in deaths, arrests, fires, and damage to vehicles, businesses and buildings. Sometimes, protests make a difference. The powers-that-be intentionally communicate that they don't make a difference, in an attempt to keep us from engaging in them. But Kennedy was constantly worried about Vietnam War protestors. The young adults who died at Kent State made visible the unchecked power of the police. The use of attack dogs and water cannon in response to the non-violent civil rights protestors brought many moderates to recognize the violence of the segregationists. The woman killed in Charlottesville showed the violence inherent in the mythology of the preserving Confederate icons. In Walter Wink's book The Powers That Be he offers many examples of authoritarian governments overthrown by non-violent protests. I am not going to tell oppressed people that they must not be violent when the powers-that-be are using violence all the time--both in the moment with shootings and beatings, and the slow violence of poverty, lack of access to health care, deportations, misnaming, and more. At the same time we should recognize that research suggests that non-violent protests have the most impact. Gandhi's idea of non-violence was explicitly to drive the powers-that-be to react violently, to show who they really were, and to publicize that. But effective non-violent protests require people who are willing to risk being hurt and being killed. Usually the risk is small. I'll admit that I want to engage in protests where old folk like me are out front, so that any violence that happens is hurting those of us who have already lived a full life. I'll also admit that I'm willing to be shot, but I'm no longer willing to take an 8 hour bus ride to the protest, walk several miles, and take the bus home the same evening. I just don't have the stamina. So I'm in the weird place that I'm willing to take the risk of death, but not the risk of sore feet or lack of a good night's sleep. Churches already engage in protests of the most mild sort. We take part in the march against hunger, in the Mother's Day Peace event, in Pride Celebrations, and other gatherings of that sort. We may not consider them protests, but they are making public the issue we care about, and are gathering people in a way that builds our commitment to these issues. It's worth a discussion in your congregation. Is this something we are willing to protest about? Why? Why not? The most important book on Non-Violence is The Powers that Be: Theology for a New Millennium by Walter Wink. This is based on his extensive academic research, but is written for ordinary readers and is well suited to congregational discussion. Order Wink at Bookshop.org Here are opinions from social scientists about protests--should we do them? Do they work? And more from several different view points. Social Scientists on Protests
0 Comments
![]() What I want out of the story of Jesus in the Temple is justification for my anger. I take up anger really easily, it is my go-to emotion. And it eats me up inside. And does nothing good for the world. Destructive anger is the thing we hold onto when the world feels out of our control. It is when we are still angry a month, and two months, and year after the event. The problem with destructive anger is that the person it destroys is me. It does not hurt the person or system that we are angry with. The solution to destructive anger is to find things in our ordinary lives that are good. I recommend the podcast Hidden Brain for more on overcoming destructive anger. But in this time, when more and more things are happening, and we are newly angry every morning or evening when we read or hear the news, we need to figure out constructive anger. This anger is good for us. Constructive anger is what we use to process the story of what has happened. Anger we use to motivate us to action. Anger we aim at leaders and not at the masses that follow. As a church, as a group, right now we have the challenge that many people are angry (and afraid, but that’s another blog!) Each person’s anger is tied into their own story. For those that have lots of leftover destructive anger—at anything—this new anger just feeds into it. It eats at the soul. And sitting next to them in the pew is someone who’s dealing with a brand new anger. And another person is just angry about one of the things and has no space for all of the other things. Still another cannot release the enormity of all of the things to even see the details. And still others have shut off the news, or are just the sort of person who thinks everything will come out all right. These people together make a congregation, and the congregation therefore must engage in two ways, addressing our anger. We need help letting go of the destructive anger. To do this we must acknowledge our inability to change others, to change the past, and our limited ability to change our government. Through lament, crying out, naming our pain, we begin letting go. We must follow that with spiritual disciplines that ground us in what is beautiful, meaningful, and loving in our lives. And we need help finding constructive uses for our anger. As a congregation we must discern some action that we con do, and can point to, as our hope that we are making some small difference. We must also take a break from action and look for what is around us that we can appreciate. Name something that we love about each other, spend time appreciating some art in our sanctuary, settle into some music that heals us. And then do an action that makes a difference. Now is the time to be overly gracious, excessively thankful, now is the time to speak kind words to someone who worships with you. Church must be a place that we can be angry. It must also be a place where we let go of the angry that is destroying us, and use our anger to construct something better. Interesting Link! Polly Plum has taken the idea of knitting or crocheting prayer shawls in an interesting new direction: Rage Wraps. Here's a constructive use for your anger! Creating Rage Wraps ![]() Here is a poem offered during my clergy support group. I think it says what I'm trying to say, with many fewer words, and more poetically. Compassion is resistance. Kindness is resistance. Connection is resistance. Community is resistance. Solidarity is resistance. Generosity is resistance. Education is resistance. Truth telling is resistance. Hope is resistance. Joy is resistance. Laughter is resistance. Peace is resistance. Above all, love is resistance. -Nicole Kontra Get Angry, Maybe. 1 of 3. If you aren't angry you aren't paying attention! I wrote an earlier blog post on this idea, but it is on my mind again. Jesus got angry, they say, and it makes sense for us to get angry too. To which I say: Maybe. Angry Jesus shows up in the temple market. In Mark he drives out the sales people and turns over the tables. In Luke (19:45-47) and Matthew (21:12-13) the focus is on the space being a house of prayer for all. Mark (11:15-18) adds that it should not be a den of thieves. He turns tables in some, and drives out the vendors in others. Lets look at the John's version: John 2:14-16 In the temple Jesus found people selling cattle, sheep, and doves and the money changers seated at their tables. 15 Making a whip of cords, he drove all of them out of the temple, with the sheep and the cattle. He also poured out the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16 He told those who were selling the doves, “Take these things out of here! Stop making my Father’s house a marketplace!” The whip, only found in John, is in all the pictures in the children's books. Jesus looks really angry. The synoptics allow us to spiritualize this story, with the emphasis on the Temple as a house of prayer, but we must not forget that the Temple is where people paid their tax to the local government, and where records of their debts are held. Jesus' anger in John's version is about the marketplace, but the purpose of that market was not to get dinner, but to get your offering converted to a form acceptable to the religious leaders. And the religious leaders were the local government. This was a protest at the statehouse. We hear nothing of the consequences of this action; well nothing except the decision of the authorities to stop Jesus. (We shouldn’t downplay that as bad. He got publicity for his action and that made people think.) I still wonder were any debts relieved? Were taxes more honestly levied? Did the government become more focused on meeting the needs of the poor? Did readers of this text use it as motivation to care for money in just ways? And yet here we are two thousand (or so) years later imagining Jesus making whips out of cords and flipping over tables. We use it as our permission to get angry, and to act on that anger to engage in violence overthrow of injustice. It does set some criteria for acting in anger. Most important the violence is against things and not against people. And even there, the marketers product is not destroyed, only removed. The tables are flipped, making a mess, but not smashed to smithereens. And the sales people themselves are not whipped, they are lectured on the importance of the space. Jesus never presumes that bad actors cannot change. He always offers words--often cryptic words--for them to mull over in the days and weeks and months to come. In the big picture of the gospels we come away with the idea that Jesus hopes that they will understand that “the time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near; repent, and believe in the good news.” (Mark 1:15). INTERESTING LINK Nadia Bolz-Weber is starting a Red State Revival and would love to come to a location near you. She says: "Because first and foremost, this is not the moment to concede the Christian faith to nationalists. Nor is it the moment to double down on things that don’t work." |
My ThoughtsFor my organized thoughts, see my book Five Loaves, Two Fish, Twelve Volunteers: Developing Relational Food Ministries. In this spot are thoughts that appear for a moment--about food programs, mission, church, building community, writing, and whatever else pops into my head. History
March 2025
Categories
All
|